McLain v. Dibble & Co.

The grounds relied on for a new trial in this cause are—

First. Because of errors of law occurring on the trial, and excepted to by defendant at the time.

Second. Because the court erred in refusing instructions asked by defendant.

Third. Because the verdict is contrary to the evidence.

The third alleged error is not insisted on in this court, and will not be noticed in this opinion.

As to the second alleged error, it is only necessary to say that the bill of exceptions does not show that the court below refused to give any instructions, nor that any were asked by the defendant. >

It was not made a…