Legal Opinion
State v. Bruno
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 18, 2009No. 18251, 18252PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The defendant, Alberto Bruno, was convicted, 1 after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), 2 sale of a narcotic substance by a person who is not drug-dependent, in violation of § 21a-278 (b), possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), 3 and conspiracy to sell a narcotic substance by a person who is not drug-dependent, in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. WahabConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.