Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Technical Minerals, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1996No. 95-SC-1051-DGPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
A contract labor company leased an employee, the appellee Douglas Edward Hawkins, (hereinafter “Hawkins”) who was injured while working temporarily for Appellee Technical Minerals, Inc., (hereinafter “TMI”). Hawkins was paid workers’ compensation benefits by contract labor company’s insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (hereinafter “USF & G”). Appellee Technical Minerals, Inc., paid the contract labor company a contract price for the employee’s services. The determinative issue is whether TMI was a contractor for the purposes of the workers’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Sherman & FletcherKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Meade v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Whittenberg Engineering & Construction Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- M.J. Daly Co. v. VarneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Simmons v. Clark Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McLain v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
- McDowell v. Jackson Energy RECCKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. JohnstonKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Franke v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
- Thompson v. Budd Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.