Legal Opinion
Mariblanca Navegacion, S.A. v. Panama Canal Co.
District Court, Canal Zone
Decided June 18, 1956No. 4345PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTHRIE F. CROWE, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. The S/S Mariposa is a single screw, steam turbine cargo vessel of Liberian registry, 6,113 gross tons, 3,524 net tons, 476.2 feet overall length, 60.7 feet beam, with an authorized tropical fresh water draft of 26 feet 5% inches. On the day of the accident the vessel was approximately on her marks. The vessel was powered by a main propulsion engine consisting of a steam reciprocating unit and a low pressure turbine unit utilizing the exhaust from the reciprocating unit. The propulsion engine was rated at a total of 4,000 indicated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Cornell Steamship Company, of the Tug, LionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Victorias Milling Co., Inc., as Owners of the M/v Nonsuco v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Bruce v. Debuse Barras Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966