Legal Opinion

Power Co. v. . Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1916Published

1Opinion

The decision in the defendant's appeal disposes also of the question in this appeal. As we have held that there should be a new trial, and as the judgment in favor of plaintiff has been set aside, there can be no amendment of it. The result in the other appeal really makes this appeal unnecessary, and it is dismissed accordingly.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Aiken v. Ins. Co., 173 N.C. 409 (5c); Potato Co. v. Jeanette,174 N.C. 240 (5c); Power Co. v. Power Co., 175 N.C. 670, S. c.; Kornegay v.Goldsboro, 180 N.C. 452, 454 (1c); Retreat Asso. v. Development Co.,183 N.C. 44 (3c); Man v. Archbell, 186…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. McAllister v. . PryorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Aiken v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Wallace v. BellamySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API