Wallace v. Bellamy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
It is essential that wo bear in mind the significance of the issues. Only two were formulated because they involve the whole controversy. The defendants admitted that the plaintiff has the record title and consented that to the first issue an affirmative answer should be given by the trial court. The principal question thus left undetermined was that of the defendants’ adverse possession, although there are assignments of error based upon the court’s refusal to dismiss the action, and upon the charge and the exclusion of evidence.
The real source of the controversy is the following clauses in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Faust v. . RohrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- FARMERS BANK, ETC. v. Michael T. Brown DistributorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Crigger v. Florida Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Durham Lumber Co. v. Wrenn-Wilson Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.