Legal Opinion
Traugott v. Arctec Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 2018No. Supreme Court No. S-16929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
On consideration of the Petition for Review filed on 12/18/17 and the response filed on 1/2/2018 ,
IT IS ORDERED:
The Petition for Review is DENIED.
Entered at the direction of the court.
WINFREE, Justice, with whom CARNEY, Justice, joins, dissenting; they would grant the petition as to the posting of the supersedeas bond pending appeal.
The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board determined, after a hearing, that Joseph Traugott's injury that happened during his employment with ARCTEC Alaska, Inc. was the substantial cause of his disability or need for medical treatment. The Board did not award…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete CuttingAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Municipality of Anchorage v. AdamsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Municipality of Anchorage v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joseph Traugott v. ARCTEC AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020