Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of S.Z.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1996No. C0-95-763PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellant Jeffrey Scott Nichols challenges a determination of the Hennepin County District Court terminating his parental rights to his son, S.Z. The court terminated Nichols’ parental rights on three statutory grounds: repeated neglect to comply with parental duties; palpable unfitness to be a party to the parent and child relationship; and because S.Z. was neglected and in foster care. On appeal, the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the termination on one of the three grounds: palpable unfitness. Nichols appeals, alleging that it was error to terminate his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Matter of the Welfare of KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Matter of Welfare of SolomonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Matter of Welfare of JMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re the Welfare of L.A.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re the Children of T.A.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In re P.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API