State v. Liliopoulos
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
— On April 17, 1931, the defendant was found guilty by a jury in the superior court of King county of the crime of grand larceny. On June 25, 1931, pursuant to order of the court, defendant’s motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment having been denied, the defendant appeared in court for sentence. The trial judge stated that, on his own motion and without any request therefor on the part of the defendant, the sentence imposed would be suspended pending the further order of the court. The judgment pronouncing sentence and suspending that sentence reads, so far as material, as follows:
“.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- People v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Baker v. MaseehArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Gehrmann v. OsborneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
- People v. MarkhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Brandon v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.