Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell-Taylor, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 4, 1946No. 28465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KOSCINSKI, District Judge.

Respondents are charged in the information with violation of War Food Order 13, Amendment 2, restricting the sale or delivery of “filled cream” having a total content of all oil and fat, including milk fat, in ■excess of 19 per cent (9 F.R. 6145). By interposing a demurrer and motion to quash the information the respondents challenge the-validity of this order.

This regulation was issued under authority of the Second War Powers Act of March 27, 1942, 56 Stat. 176, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, Title III, § 633, amending Sec. 1152, and pursuant to Executive Order 9280, 50…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Tarrance v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Smith v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. American Distilling Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API