Legal Opinion

Lau v. Pontiac Commercial & Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 36,528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Frank H. Lau, receiver of Detroit, Pontiac & Owosso Bailway Company, a corporation, and of Detroit Construction Company, Ltd., a partnership association, on October 4, 1930, filed 'a bill of complaint against the Pontiac Commercial & Savings Bank and Hugh A. McPherson, receiver. Plaintiff alleges that the railway and construction companies between the years 1911 and 1917 planned and took steps to build a railway that was to run from Pontiac to Owosso, Michigan, and for that purpose acquired for terminal purposes approximately 5% acres in Waterford township, Oakland county,' Michigan. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Grant v. National Manufacturer & Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Donovan v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EubanksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Sweitzer v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hope Land Mineral Corp. v. ChristianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Gratiot Lumber & Coal Co. v. LubinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API