Legal Opinion

In Re Stoltz

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 13, 1998No. 19-10172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING MOTION TO ASSUME

FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor, through a plan of reorganization, moves to assume a residential real property lease Creditor claims was terminated pre-petition. We deny Debtor’s Motion to Assume 1 because the lease expired before Debtor filed this chapter 13 case.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Debtor and her family reside in an apartment owned and operated by Creditor, a landlord offering federally funded housing to the public in Brattleboro, Vermont. Debtor and Creditor entered into a month-to-month lease agreement on August 1, 1996,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Gallatin Housing Authority v. Talley (In Re Talley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986
  3. In Re MorganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1994
  4. In Re Sok Jun KongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  5. Tucker v. BushwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Laura StoltzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Brattleboro Housing Authority v. StoltzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2001
  4. Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing Authority (In Re Stoltz)District Court, D. Vermont · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API