Legal Opinion

Arizona Department of Revenue v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1976No. 12636PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

The State Tax Commission assessed a transactional privilege and education excise tax of $3,172.28 against Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (Mountain Bell) on the sale and lease of telephone equipment to the United States Government, Department of the Army. The State Tax Commission held that the total gross proceeds received by Mountain Bell for the sale of the system and the lease of the switcher were taxable under the transaction privilege and education excise taxes, A.R.S. § 42-1301, et seq., § 42-1361, et seq., as a sale and lease of tangible personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tower Plaza Investments, Limited v. DeWittArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Arizona State Tax Com'n v. Garrett CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. SelbyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Action Marine, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Karbal v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. CCI Europe, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API