Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Perkins

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1993No. 18188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Upon the demise of Claude S. Perkins (Perkins), his son, Mark Perkins, became executor of the Perkins estate and submitted a final account of the estate’s assets on August 21, 1992. Mark’s siblings, Andrew D. Perkins, David L. Perkins, and Phyllis N. Riggs (Objectors) filed an objection to the final account, claiming that the account inaccurately named their sister, Alice C. Coyle (Alice), as beneficiary of four annuity policies.

In a Judgment issued November 30, 1992, the Fifth Judicial Circuit Court held that Alice was neither beneficiary nor owner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wolff v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Dakota National Bank v. MaxonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. MarkveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Gilbert v. Constitution State Service, Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000
  4. Davis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
  5. First Dakota National Bank v. MaxonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API