Legal Opinion

Palm Desert National Bank v. Federal Insurance

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 5, 2007No. CV 04-7078GPSSSXPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PALM DESERT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING FEDERAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SCHIAVELLI, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on Plaintiff Palm Desert National Bank (“PDNB”) and Defendant Federal Insurance Company’s (“Federal”) motions for partial summary judgment and summary judgment, respectively. The parties have filed a stipulation of undisputed facts (“Joint Stip”), which both parties admit forms the core of the facts necessary to resolve the cross-motions.

I. BACKGROUND

PDNB is a bank, headquartered in Palm Desert, California, that engages…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. California Casualty Insurance v. Northland InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Ben Pulitzer Creations, Inc. v. Phoenix InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloomington Lincoln Mercury Inc. d/b/a Lincoln of Bloomington v. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  2. CashZone Check Cashing Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. CashZone Check Cashing Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API