Beech v. City of Mobile
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUTLER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment—one on behalf of the individual defendants Marshall K. Freeman, R. Grant Chambless and John Mo-lyneux (doc. # 26) and one on behalf of the City of Mobile (doc. # 24). After reviewing these motions, the disputed and undisputed facts and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion filed by the individual defendants is due to be denied but that the motion filed by the City of Mobile is due to be granted.
I. Factual Background 1
This action arises from an incident that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. Wallace Community College-SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
- Rose v. Town of Jackson's GapDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Romero v. City of ClantonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
- Cohen v. HillDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022