Legal Opinion
Baum v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 17, 1968No. 67 C 1792PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss and for a Ruling Under Rule 23
This is a purported class action brought against Investors Diversified Services, Inc. (hereinafter known as “IDS”), by plaintiffs Bernard M. Baum and Daniel S. Shulman, under Section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 13(a). Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for its alleged failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the alternative, and only if the motion to dismiss is denied, defendant moves, under Rule 23(c) (1) of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Tri-State Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. United Press International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- The American Oil Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schaefer v. First National Bank of LincolnwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Thill Securities Corporation, Etc. v. The New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- GVF Cannery, Inc. v. California Tomato Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- In Re Mutual Fund Sales Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Haddad v. Crosby Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.