Legal Opinion
In Re Mutual Fund Sales Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 14, 1973No. Civ. A. No. Misc. 103-73. Civ. A. No. 2454-72, 338-73, 426-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
374 F.Supp. 95 (1973)
In re MUTUAL FUND SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
Genevieve M. HADDAD, Plaintiff,
v.
The CROSBY CORPORATION et al., Defendants.[*]
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC., et al., Defendants.[**]
Arthur GROSS, Joseph Lerman, and Rose Lerman, on behalf of themselves and all other individual mutual fund shareholders similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC., et al., Defendants.[***]
Civ. A. No. Misc. 103-73. Civ. A. No. 2454-72, 338-73, 426-73.
United States District Court, District of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Billing v. Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re REA Express, Inc., Private Treble Damage, Etc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Haddad v. Crosby Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976