Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ioannides

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-P-1744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At his trial on two indictments charging receipt of stolen property worth *905more than $250 (gold smuggled from a metal refineiy), Ioannides proposed to testify in his defense and filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of a prior conviction of distributing a class B substance. The trial judge considered the motion at an unrecorded lobby conference, a practice that handicaps our review. From the judge’s on-record explanation of his ruling toward the end of the trial and from the briefs of the parties, we can piece together what occurred. Defense counsel urged that the judge exercise his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Bradley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Acevedo v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Bells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. KalhauserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BilodeauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. State v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API