Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kalhauser

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 24, 2001No. 98-P-1318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

On the morning of trial, defense counsel, by motion in limine, moved to exclude the defendant’s prior conviction for manslaughter to clear the way for the defendant’s testimony. This motion was, for the most part, denied. We decide that the trial judge was incorrect in ruling that the sentence imposed on the prior conviction could be read along with the conviction for impeachment purposes, but that the error did not result in a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. There are subsidiary appellate issues concerning sufficiency of proof, other evidentiary rulings, and adequate…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. FerreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EugeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. FarleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MoraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API