Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 15, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Judge.

This Court granted the appellants’ Rule 10 interlocutory appeal to determine the correctness of the trial court’s finding that the district attorney general did not abuse his discretion in refusing to place the appellants on pretrial diversion. The appellants contend that they qualify for pretrial diversion; and the trial court should have ordered the district attorney general to grant them pretrial diversion relief. The state argues that the trial court properly upheld the district attorney general’s refusal to grant the appellants this relief.

The judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WinsettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. State v. WatkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. State v. HollandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CutshawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. State of Tennessee v. Barry HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. State of Tennessee v. Guy Len BiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API