Bray v. Comer Mercantile Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
-(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only point insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is the alleged error in striking paragraph 5 of the plea. The special ground of the motion for a new trial complaining of the striking of this paragraph cannot be considered, since “a ruling of the court in striking a plea cannot be made the ground of a motion for a new trial.” Wilkinson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 330 (1) (89 S. E. 460), and eases cited. However, exceptions pendente lite having been filed to the striking of this paragraph, the question is properly raised by an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Hansford v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Pidcock v. Crouch & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Auto Loan Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. SternburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Mobley v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Rogers v. Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Bank of Tallapoosa v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.