Legal Opinion

Pace v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe proofs were entirely documentary and there was no controversy as to the material facts. The questions at issue involved the construction of insurance contracts between insured and defendant, and the legal effect of the failure of the insured to pay the premiums on the policies since 26 August, 1921. The only exception noted by the plaintiff was to the ruling of the court and the instructions to the jury that the insurance was not in force and effect at the time of the death of the decedent, 4 January, 1940.

*453From the insurance policies, the applications for insurance, correspondence, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. McCampbell v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  3. McConnell v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  4. Stramback v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Wilkinson v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lentin v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Brooks v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Cananwill, Inc. v. EMAR Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  4. Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Southwestern Life Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API