Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Block
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 5, 1987No. CV-83-173-GFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, District Judge.
Thomas and Anna Nichols were loan recipients under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (“CFRDA”) as codified at Title 7, Chapter 50, §§ 1921 et seq., of the United States Code, and administered by the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”). This case arises from the allegedly improper handling of the Nichols’ loan accounts by the FmHA officials charged with that responsibility. The Nichols contend those officials failed to follow the statutes and administrative regulations governing the administration of such accounts. The Nichols seek monetary compensation…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Andrew Chen and Chen Printing and Supply Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Louis Butler O'Neal v. March Fong Eu Roy E. Bailey, Department of Veterans Administration Dorcas T. Hardy, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kahoohanohano v. DHS, STATEHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Kent v. City of Columbia FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.