Legal Opinion
Hodgson v. Hyatt Realty & Investment Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 30, 1973No. Nos. C-139-WS-71, C-140-S-71PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HIRAM H. WARD, District Judge.
The Secretary of Labor (Secretary) instituted these actions, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (Act), 29 U. S.C. § 201 et seq., seeking to enjoin defendants from violating the minimum wage, overtime and recordkeeping provisions of the Act, and to restrain them from withholding back wages owed to their employees. Defendant Hyatt Realty and Investment Company, Inc., (C-139-WS-71), and the defendants Hamiltons, d/b/a N. C. Motor Vehicle License Agency, (C-140-S-71), operate the business of issuing license plates for the State of North…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jerome v. Zorich and Robert Wirkkala v. Long Beach Fire Department and Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hodgson v. HYATT REALTY AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1973