State v. Danielski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state from a pretrial order of the trial court ruling that expert testimony concerning typical familial sexual abuse symptoms and behavior is inadmissible for trial. The state contends that evidence that the complainant exhibited behavior consistent with having been a victim of sexual abuse is a proper subject of expert testimony. We affirm.
FACTS
Following allegations involving sexual contact and penetration between a child and her step-father, criminal charges were brought against the step-father, Dean Dan-ielski. The acts allegedly occurred from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DurfeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Schleret v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DanielskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990