Legal Opinion

King v. Liotti

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.

Motion to examine the defendants before trial granted as prayed for with the exception that all language following the word “ defendants ” on the sixth line of item “ 2 ” will be deleted. The claim of privilege against self-incriminatian is no ground for denying a motion for the examination of *673a party before trial. The right to refuse to incriminate oneself is a personal right which must be claimed at the time when the questions are asked. (Heit & Weisenthal, Inc., v. Licht, 218 App. Div. 753.) This privilege may be claimed at the examination before trial as in the ca^e of an examination at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Matter of Siegel v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill PrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. In Re Follett's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1958
  3. In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API