Legal Opinion

German v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 13, 1948No. 9601PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, a seaman, brought action below on the law side to recover cure and maintenance, and damages by reason of unseaworthiness of ithe vessel, under the admiralty and maritime laws; also damages under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, by reason of negligence. The three-pronged action was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict in German’s favor in the amount of $4,011. Defendant’s alternative motions for a new trial or for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict, were denied by the trial court.

The defendant urges here, as it did in the court below,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Harmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Nowery v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Max Morel v. Sabine Towing & Transportation Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Durden v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Claude Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No. 4, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Gabriel Vincent v. Harvey Well ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Helen Shaw v. Ohio River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API