Rikansrud v. City of Canton
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, J..
Water from a broken city main flooded and damaged the foundation, basement and. sidewalks of plaintiffs' home. It is the theory of plaintiffs that this water gained entrance to their premises by following along through the backfilled trench of a city trunk sewer, and thence through the backfilled trench of plaintiffs’ service sewer. They make no claim that the break in the water main resulted from negligence of the city. They allege the city did negligently construct, maintain and repair the described trunk sewer and thereby caused the water to enter the premises. The answer of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Granflaten v. RohdeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Midwest Oil Co. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Erickson v. ToddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Zacher v. Budd Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Ward v. LaCreek Electric AssociationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Yarrow v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1967
- McElhaney v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.