Legal Opinion

United States v. Mullen

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 29, 1925No. 8938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTIE, District Judge.

Reasons for overruling motions to quash, for new trial, and in arrest of judgment.

The motions were based principally upon an alleged misjoinder of offenses, misjoinder of defendants, and duplicity. The other grounds of the motions are dependent upon or connected with those above mentioned. The general rule of law, as laid down by section 1024 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §.1690), is: “When there are several charges against any person for the same act or transaction, or for two or more acts or transactions connected together, or for two or more acts or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Gardes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
  3. Coco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Hartman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Brimie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mellor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. MellorDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API