Legal Opinion

Coco v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1923No. 5839PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in error, who will be hereafter referred to as defendants, in November, 1919, were residing on Wilson avenue in the city of St. Louis. Defendants Puglisi, Grasso, and Coco lived at No. 5033, and Cantigli at No. 5035.

The defendants were jointly indicted under sections 3258 and 3282 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §§ 5994, 6022). The indictment contains five counts. The first and second are identical in language, and charge that on or about the 8th day of November, A. D. 1919, at No. 5035 Wilson avenue, in the city of St. Louis, etc., the defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. DietrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1904
  3. State v. DaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Henry Dewitt Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  3. Cataneo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  4. State v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Sasser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API