Legal Opinion

Tilton v. Sharpe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The defendant contends that he is entitled to an entrance at B because it has been found on the amended record that without it he cannot profitably carry on the business which he proposes to transact. The answer to this contention is that the test of the reasonableness of the proposed use is to be found, not by inquiring whether such use is essential to the profitable transaction of any particular business on his lot, but in answer to the inquiry whether such use would be fraught with such unusual hazard that the danger to the traveling public would be out of proportion to the detriment to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. Manchester Amusement Co. v. Conn.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  3. Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Johnston v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bowling v. City of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. City of Miami v. GirtmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API