Legal Opinion

Gadek v. Kugler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 3, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review the finding and judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of Linden.

We conclude that a writ should be denied and the rule to show cause discharged. For this there are several reasons.

1. That the attorney for the applicant is not a counselor-at-law, and, therefore, not entitled to prosecute this rule. Moore v. Bradley Beach, 81 N. J. L. 395.

2. The applicant is in laches in applying for the writ.

This is so if his contention is correct that service of notice of appeal upon the secretary of the board on…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appley v. Township Committee of BernardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  2. Northwestern National Insurance v. AverillOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API