Gadek v. Kugler
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This is a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review the finding and judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of Linden.
We conclude that a writ should be denied and the rule to show cause discharged. For this there are several reasons.
1. That the attorney for the applicant is not a counselor-at-law, and, therefore, not entitled to prosecute this rule. Moore v. Bradley Beach, 81 N. J. L. 395.
2. The applicant is in laches in applying for the writ.
This is so if his contention is correct that service of notice of appeal upon the secretary of the board on…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Appley v. Township Committee of BernardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Northwestern National Insurance v. AverillOregon Supreme Court · 1935