Legal Opinion
Appley v. Township Committee of Bernards
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 18, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the careful and comprehensive opinion of Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court, ubi supra.
However, one irregularity in practice should not pass unnoticed. The case is submitted on briefs, and the brief for the appellant bears the signatures of two members of the bar as “of counsel” though one of them is not a counselor-at-law. If his signature had been the only one, the brief would have been rejected, pursuant to well settled rules. Duysters v. Crawford, 69 N. J. L. 229; Leaver v. Kilmer, 54 Atl. Rep. 817; reversed on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hirsch v. DePuySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Gadek v. KuglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMITSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Struyk v. Samuel Braen's SonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSONSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- S & L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Washington Twp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Jones v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Long Beach Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.