Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Holmes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1993No. 90-15-130 CV; CA A72603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Plaintiff Stephen Holmes (Steve) brought this action for an accounting and dissolution of one or more partnerships that he had with his son, defendant Mike Holmes (Mike), and for cancellation of a deed. Mike appeals from the trial court’s judgment, assigning error to findings concerning what constitutes the assets of the partnership, the distribution of those assets and the cancellation of the deed. We review de novo and affirm the trial court, except with regard to the distribution of assets.1 We need address only, three of the assignments of error.

Mike first contends that the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Burnett v. Lemon Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Russell's Realty, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Oshatz v. GoltzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Davis v. TadevicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API