Holmes v. Holmes

Defendant Mike Holmes seeks review of our opinion in this case, 119 Or App 36, 849 P2d 1140 (1993), contending that we erred in affirming the trial court’s determination of what constitutes partnership assets. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and write to address defendant’s contention that we erred in determining that River Ranch is a partnership asset. With.some modification, we adhere to our decision.

In our opinion, we described the events that led to the transfer of the deed to River Ranch from plaintiff Steve Holmes to Mike:

“In 1986, Steve learned of a special…