Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1951No. 6 Div. 156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted in the circuit court on a charge of possessing lottery *73tickets in violation of Section 600 of the General City Code of' Birmingham, Alabama.

This ordinance was held to be constitutional in Fiorella v. City of Birmingham, 35 Ala.App. 384, 48 So.2d 761, certiorari denied 254 Ala. 515, 48 So.2d 768.

The jury by'its verdict fixed the punishment at a fine and hard labor for the City.

It seems to be now well settled that in cases of this nature the power is in the trial judge and not the jury to impose hard labor. Nix v. City of Andalusia, 21 Ala. App.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fiorella v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Frost v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Arnold v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. King v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hurst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Houk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Cobb v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Dotson v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API