Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1933No. 7 Div. 194PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The indictment was for robbery, and was in the prescribed form. Sections 4527, 4547, 4556, 8682, Code. There was a verdict of guilt, and punishment by imprisonment in the penitentiary was imposed.

The Objections to the genuineness of an indictment as a court record held required to be raised in the court below, before pleading to the merits, “by a timely motion to quash, or to strike the paper from the files.” Section 4547, Code; Jackson v. State, 74 Ala. 26; Russell v. State, 33 Ala. 366; Davis v. State, 131 Ala. 10, 31 So. 569; Johnson v. State, 19 Ala. App. 308, 97 So. 150.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. State v. ThayerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API