Bell v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The indictment was for robbery, and was in the prescribed form. Sections 4527, 4547, 4556, 8682, Code. There was a verdict of guilt, and punishment by imprisonment in the penitentiary was imposed.
The Objections to the genuineness of an indictment as a court record held required to be raised in the court below, before pleading to the merits, “by a timely motion to quash, or to strike the paper from the files.” Section 4547, Code; Jackson v. State, 74 Ala. 26; Russell v. State, 33 Ala. 366; Davis v. State, 131 Ala. 10, 31 So. 569; Johnson v. State, 19 Ala. App. 308, 97 So. 150.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- State v. ThayerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.