Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Duhme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1914No. 3814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Superior Court, ■OTclahomd County; E. D. Oldfield, Judge. Action by Herman Duhme, Jr., against the City of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

This is a proceeding commenced in the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts pursuand to Rev.’ Laws 1910, see. 5303, providing for the submission of a controversy. The facts submitted are that defendant in error is the owner of paving •bond No. 71 of series No. 75, issued by the municipality of Oklahoma City, for the improvement of Classen Boulevard; that said bond is past due'and remains unpaid, although duly presented to- the city treasurer for payment; that at the time the city treasurer bad collected and had within the treasury a fund sufficient in amount to pay said bond derived…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spitzer v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oklahoma City v. HoehlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API