Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Hoehler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1918No. 8886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hay son. Judge. Action by F. O. Hoehler and H. W. Cummings, partners as Hoehler & Cummings, against the City of Oklahoma City. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

F. C. Hoehlejr and F. W. Cummings as partners commenced this action against the city of Oklahoma City to recover certain sums alleged to be due as interest on certain paving warrants and bonds from the maturity of said obligations to the payment thereof. Judgment was for plaintiff, and the city appears.

The ordinances under which the obligations were issued were' approved by the) may- or on various dates beginning March 3, 1908, until July 4, 1908. The streets on which the improvements were] made were improved. some of them under House Bill No. 231, Session Laws 1907-08, approved April 17,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oklahoma City v. DuhmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grand Lodge of the Order of Sons of Herman v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API