Legal Opinion
Howard v. Headly
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1999No. 1:98-cv-02528PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carter Howard (“Howard”), an inmate in a New York State correctional facility, brings this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, alleging that prison officials who required him to work beyond his physical capabilities violated his First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. He seeks damages and injunctive relief. Defendants Frank Headly (“Headly”), Daniel Crum (“Crum”), and Kay Fiegl-Bock (“Fiegl-Bock”) are employees of the New York State Department of Corrections (“DOC”). They move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCoy v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Arnold v. GoetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. BascianoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Perez v. HawkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Miller v. New York State Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002