Village of Rockton v. Sonoco Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ..
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge
Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [34] is granted in part and de*702nied in part. Counts 2-8, 13-16, 19-27, 34-53, 56-57, 59-75, and 80-82 of the consolidated amended complaint are dismissed, and Rockton’s claim for attorneys fees and costs is stricken. All other claims remaining pending, and the parties should contact the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. . .
STATEMENT
Plaintiff, Village of Rockton, Illinois (“Rockton”), initiated this litigation against defendant, Sonoco Products Company (“Sonoco”), ' by • filing '81…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Cleary v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Landis v. Marc Realty, L.L.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Maryland v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026