Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Procter & Gamble Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 30, 2018No. Case No. 17-22652-CIV-WILLIAMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Company ("PG"). (DE 17). Plaintiff David M. Rodriguez, filed a response in opposition (DE 22) and Defendant filed a reply (DE 29). For the reasons set forth below, the motion (DE 17) is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed this action, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, asserting a claim of alienage discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiff is a Venezuelan national residing in Miami, Florida, who is authorized to work in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. West Florida-PPH, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API