Rodriguez v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Company ("PG"). (DE 17). Plaintiff David M. Rodriguez, filed a response in opposition (DE 22) and Defendant filed a reply (DE 29). For the reasons set forth below, the motion (DE 17) is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed this action, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, asserting a claim of alienage discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiff is a Venezuelan national residing in Miami, Florida, who is authorized to work in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robinson v. West Florida-PPH, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024