Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 2008No. CA CR 07-328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge.

Appellant, a man in Judge. and sexual assault of a twelve-year-old girl. On appeal, he asserts that the trial judge erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. We affirm.

During appellant’s jury trial, the victim testified that she was raped and sexually assaulted by appellant at her home when appellant was her mother’s live-in boyfriend. Although appellant was being tried only for crimes committed against the twelve-year-old victim, another girl testified without objection that she, too, was raped by appellant under similar circumstances when she was fifteen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacKool v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API