Legal Opinion
Otte v. Arkansas State Board of Acupuncture
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 31, 2005No. 04-901PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Gunter, Justice.
Appellant, Dr. Per Otte, appeals the judgment of the Garland County Circuit Court affirming the decision of the Arkansas State Board of Acupuncture and Related Techniques. The Board held that Otte does not have a valid license to practice acupuncture and related techniques in Arkansas and is not presendy eligible to hold a license in Arkansas because he has not taken the examination required by Arkansas law. We affirm.
In November 1995, Otte moved to Hot Springs Village and set up an acupuncture practice, specializing in the treatment of eye diseases. In 1997, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- ARK. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, ST FRANCIS DCFS v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Andrews v. BallardDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
- Williams v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. KidderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brookshire v. AdcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Walls v. Arkansas Oil & Gas CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Capstone Oilfield Disposal of Arkansas, Inc. v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009