Legal Opinion

State v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 1999No. 10-97-02208; CA A98958PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARREN, S. J.

Defendant is charged with first-degree robbery and kidnaping arising from an aborted robbery of a convenience store and abduction of the store clerk. There is no significant dispute about the facts of the crime; the primary issue at trial will be whether defendant is the person who committed it. The state appeals the trial court’s pretrial rulings excluding evidence that, the state believes, tends to prove that defendant was the criminal. The trial court held that the non-expert evidence was irrelevant and excluded the testimony of a state expert. We affirm.

In February 1997, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BrumbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. IronsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API