Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1997No. B109127PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

When a warrant is sought for the search of the office of a lawyer who is not the target of a criminal investigation, a special master must be appointed to accompany the person who serves the warrant. At the scene of the search, the special master must tell the attorney what he is looking for, and advise the attorney of his right to voluntarily relinquish the items requested. If the attorney declines, the special master then conducts the search within the areas permitted by the warrant, and seizes the authorized items. If the attorney tells the special master that a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. 2,022 Ranch L.L.C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API