Bidwell v. Love
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; C. F. Irwin, Judge. Action By F. A. Bidwell and others against J. P. Love, sheriff. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; C. F. Irwin, Judge. Action By F. A. Bidwell and others against J. P. Love, sheriff. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. At the June, 1904, term of the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma an order fixing the terms of court for the Second judicial district, omitting caption, was made as follows: “That terms of the district court in the Second judicial district of the territory of Oklahoma are hereby fixed to be begun and held as follows: The county of Custer at Arapaho, Monday, September 5, 1904; for -the county of Greer at…
1Opinion of the Court
Háyes, J.
(after stating the facts as above). -The sole question presented in this case is: Did the district court of Oklahoma Territory have power to hold adjourned sessions of court after the commencement of the regular term at a time not designated in .the order of the Supreme Court fixing the terms of said court and subsequent to the regular term of the court in another county in the same district?
The section of the organic act under which the Supreme Court acted in fixing terms of the court for the Second judicial district reads as follows:
“The Supreme Court shall define said judicial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. CrillySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Miller v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- State ex rel. Chick v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Rich v. VarianIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Ex Parte HaleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923