Legal Opinion

(PC) Mendez v. Diaz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 24, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01759Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE MENDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01759-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND 14 DIAZ, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 14) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff Frankie Mendez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 21…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API