Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Escamilla

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1982No. Civ. 5531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

Appellant Louisa Escamilla appeals from an interlocutory judgment of marital dissolution, challenging the trial court’s division of community assets, the interest rate imposed upon a future payment appellant is to make to respondent, and conditions imposed upon an award of the exclusive possession of the family home to appellant as child support. For the reasons to be explained, we hold two of the conditions of the house possession award are unrelated to child support and must be stricken. We also point out an omission in the order pertaining to the method of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BosemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Marriage of HerrmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of StallcupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. In Re the Marriage of ZaentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Blevins v. SheltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hoberg v. Hoberg (In Re Hoberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API